If there is anything worth considering in Pt 3, it might be this:
“As many as I love I rebuke and chasten, be zealous therefore and repent”
It’s a rather plain statement, isn’t it? But the implications, plain as they might be in the plainness of the statement, are very penetrating. In one sense we are quite deconstructed in it, and by it. Do any already sense, even as I do in the reading of it, some very deep caution in handling it? At least as far (and no doubt much farther) as to any using of it to any personal end? But this, also and no less, is an intensely personal matter (what isn’t in God’s handling of man in Christ?) that begs our consideration in the light of Jesus Christ.
If our first inclination remains our only inclination, and our only understanding, how much can be missed? Mistaken? Misapprehended? If an all is presented but we are only satisfied with a part, even pleased only “in part”, God remains blameless. But we may find ourselves heaping judgment to ourselves, not by God’s lack of plainness, but by our presumptions in abundance.
I have no doubt, and have already expressed, of the immeasurable comfort that may be found there. But if we stop at, or remain fixed at: “I have felt the Lord’s heavy hand upon me, therefore I am surely (even if sorely) loved”, what might be “the more” we are in fact, despising in our knowing?
Oh, yes, we might admit we are very well aware (and often more aware) of those times, situations, circumstances in which we have sensed the humbling of coming up against the Almighty in a manifest defeat of our own selves (either in attitudes, words, or deeds) and in which, by receiving that gift of repentance we have been clearly shown the Lord’s righteous vindication of His Name.
We were in that sense beaten by another, shown His power of all supremacy that defeated (defeats) us, and, in admission of the fault of opposition now made clear to us (through that gift of repentance) come away or proceeded to, and now from, a place of more clarity. Or greater accord.
Yes, most of us are very aware of “our sufferings”. The things we have endured.
And here I am reminded of another thing mentioned previously to which we may rarely give words (except in an inner bias) “I sure do hope my most severe trials are behind me” Gee, must this also be “brought to light” again!…(if sensing any truth to it?) And why?
Are we yet renewed to the truth that someone indeed knows us better than ourselves, and have we found enough of grace to even admit that at times it is very uncomfortable (even irritating) despite the truth that there is no comfort outside of Him? It’s a strange thing this. Discovering a great desire to be loved, to be accepted (even to be made clear to us as taking place), yet not much wanting the rebukes and chastenings that are that very proof of its taking place. At the least…not wanting too much of them. What then are we refusing by this preference? This inner bias?
If we proceed from some understanding that all communication is to the end of making a thing known, even ourselves…thoughts, opinions, displays of deeds, convictions, dispositions, preferences it would appear there is a desire to be “known”. To make statement of who we are.
But we also find some limiting, do we not? We don’t want to be too well known…we don’t want all the beans spilled, do we? There are thoughts and excursions of mind we really prefer remain hidden and known only to us. A longing to be known…but not too well…known.
How seemingly paradoxical, as so much seems! A fellowship with a one with no seeming lack of knowing us, even to all knowledge of us (true to truth beyond our even knowing of our own selves) nor need to be moved by need! All the things we withhold (and often even deny of ourselves!) to maintain some presentability, even acceptability, are all too plain to Him.
How indeed, is this working? What is impetus? Perhaps there is much rebuking and chastening necessary, or so much more than we could either have ever imagined necessary, nor even ever wanted…to bring us to some fundamental confession that the word love in Christ’s mouth and our own, are two very opposing…and entirely different matters.
And as we discover this true of so many things…perhaps even all things of which Jesus Christ speaks, we might come to a place too plain: “I really have no idea, or had no idea (depending upon our estate) of what you mean, Lord Jesus” Both in the words you use and their meaning to you…nor even the “why” of why you speak them.
By simple confession we may find a door opened to us. Our trouble of understanding (or better, our troubles made plain in our not understanding) may lead to a very large place. Even as is spoken, “There I will give her back her vineyards and I will make the Valley of Achor a door of hope” A door in a place of trouble. And troubling.
(Pt 5 to follow)